Retaliation and Information Integrity: Safeguarding Stakeholder Voices

ID: 1483

Presenting Author: Olivia Rosita Llanillo

Session: 521 - Development Accountability: fear of retaliation, and how it may affect the integrity of impact assessments

Status: pending


Summary Statement

Exploring how retaliation against stakeholders undermines information integrity in impact assessments, this session discusses protective mechanisms, and shares case studies


Abstract

In impact assessment, the integrity of information is most important. However, when stakeholders—particularly vulnerable communities—face retaliation for voicing concerns, the flow of accurate information is obstructed. This session will discuss the link between retaliation and the proliferation of misinformation and disinformation in impact assessments.

Drawing from experiences within the ADB Accountability Mechanism, we will explore:

The Impact of Retaliation: How fear of reprisal suppresses stakeholder input, leading to information vacuums that can be filled with misinformation.
Mechanisms for Protection: Strategies and tools employed to safeguard stakeholders, ensuring their voices contribute to credible assessments.
Case Studies: Real-world examples highlighting challenges and successes in addressing retaliation and maintaining information integrity.
Collaborative Approaches: Engaging with communities, civil society, and institutions to foster environments where information flows freely and safely.
By examining these facets, the session aims to underscore the importance of protecting stakeholder voices to uphold the credibility and effectiveness of impact assessments.


Author Bio

Olivia Llanillo is a lawyer at ADB specializing in accountability, grievance redress, mediation, and safeguards, with deep experience protecting stakeholder voices in complex complaints.


← Back to Submitted Abstracts