Resettlement and Consent: Safeguards and Social Rebuttals in Development

ID: 2246

Presenting Author: Seonghee Kang

Session: 590 - Territorial Security in Communities Impacted by Industrial Activities

Status: pending


Summary Statement

This paper analyzes disputes between project proponents and indigenous communities, highlighting differing views on resettlement, rights, consent, and the need for equitable engagement.


Abstract

This paper summarizes and analyzes ongoing disputes between project proponents and affected indigenous communities in a large infrastructure development project. It highlights contrasting perspectives: proponents emphasize resettlement efforts and labor engagement as positive practices, while indigenous groups challenge these claims, citing concerns about land rights, cultural impacts, and consultation adequacy. The paper examines a series of rebuttals and contested narratives on social safeguards, inclusion, and equity, underscoring the complex power dynamics and differing interpretations of consent and participation. It reveals challenges in reconciling development goals with the rights of affected communities. The analysis aims to deepen the understanding of ensuring genuine community participation in development cooperation. The conclusion stresses the need for transparent, culturally sensitive engagement, emphasizing that meaningful dialogue and participation are vital for sustainable, equitable infrastructure development. Insights offered have implications for improving safeguard effectiveness and fostering trustful partnerships in future projects.


Author Bio

Environmental and Social Safeguards practitioner focused on social sustainability and development. Holds advanced degrees in Development Policy and broad experience in international projects.


← Back to Submitted Abstracts